Introduction In grounded theory research, the existing literature is not used as a theoretical background, but rather as data to be used by the analytic strategies of the research. But funding bodies usually expect that applicants will demonstrate knowledge in the field of inquiry through a literature review, and Ethics committees also often require a brief review of the topic of interest. This is examined through the perspectives presented by the three main approaches: The implications of doing a literature review in early stages of a grounded theory research are presented as related not only to the methodological approach, but also, and more importantly, to its epistemological framework.
Introduction Despite 50 years of development experience, fundamental questions remain unanswered. The world still lacks a comprehensive theoretical framework that adequately explains such phenomenon as the accelerating velocity of development exhibited by East Asian countries, the failure of Malthusian projections, the growing contribution of non-material resources not subject to depletion, the apparent failure of market policies in the transition of Eastern Europe, and conflicting predictions about the future of work based on the contrary recent experiences of North America and Western Europe.
A profusion of economic theories provide explanations for specific expressions of development, but none unite the pieces into a unified theory that adequately defines the central principles, process and stages of development.
This paper is identifies the central principle of development and traces its expression in different fields, levels and stages of expression. The paper traces the stages in the emergence of higher, more complex, more productive levels of social organization through the historical stages of nomadic hunting, rural agrarian, urban, commercial, industrial and post-industrial societies.
It examines the process by which new activities are introduced by pioneers, imitated, resisted, accepted, organized, institutionalized and assimilated into the culture.
Organizational development takes place on a foundation of three levels of infrastructure - physical, organizational and mental.
Four types of resources contribute to development, of which only the most Research methodology different types of philosophical are inherently limited in nature. The productivity of resources increases enormously as the level of organization and input of knowledge rises.
Historically, social development has passed through three progressive, but overlapping stages in which three different components of human consciousness served as primary engines for social advancement. The paper draws parallels between the catalytic role of population growth, urbanization, the spread of a money economy, and, most recently, Internet as accelerators of the development process.
Looking backward, the development achievements of the world over the past five decades have been unprecedented and remarkable. Looking forward into the next century, daunting developmental challenges confront humanity.
Despite 50 years of intensive effort, the world is still blindly groping for adequate answers to fundamental questions about development and for effective strategies to accelerate the process.
Recent accomplishments point to the possibility of converting these 50 years of experience into a conscious and consistent theoretical knowledge. Impending challenges point to the need for a comprehensive theory of social development that will lead to the formulation of more effective strategies.
Observations and Questions about Recent Development Experience A few observations highlight some striking aspects of recent development experience that need to be theoretically understood and some perplexing questions that need to be answered to meet the opportunities and challenges of the coming years.
The world has made greater progress in eradicating poverty over the past 50 years than during the previous Over the past five decades, average per capita income in the world more than tripled, in spite of unprecedented population growth. In developing countries, real per capita consumption rose by 70 percent between and What have been the principle reasons for this phenomenal progress?
What do these results augur for the coming decades? The pace of human development has increased dramatically and is still accelerating: It took the United Kingdom 58 years, beginning into double its output per capita.
The United States did it in 47 years, beginning in Japan accomplished the feat in only 24 years, beginning in the s. More remarkably, China has doubled in the past 10 years and is on course to double again in the next eight.
During the period from toreal per capita standards of living based on purchasing power parity multiplied twelve-fold in South Korea, seven-fold in Japan, more than six-fold in Egypt and Portugal, and well above five-fold in Indonesia and Thailand.
These countries have demonstrated beyond doubt that much higher rates of growth are achievable than at any time in the past. What are the factors that make possible and limit this accelerated progress?
What implications does it have for nations just entering the take-off stage? The rate of growth differs widely among nations and communities and the differences appear to be widening: Between andper capita GDP rose by 5. Yet despite extensive efforts to draw lessons from the impressive achievements of the Asian Tigers, no formula has emerged that is generally applicable to countries faced with differing conditions and at different stages of development.
What factors account for the vast differences in performance? What valid principles can be derived from the disparities in performance? Dire predictions of pending doom based on an extrapolation from past trends have been repeatedly proven wrong: Malthus failed to anticipate the gigantic strides that would be made in increasing food production.
UN estimates have since been drastically revised downward to project that world population is likely to peak at 7. What principle, facts or misjudgments can account for this repeated tendency to predict insurmountable obstacles and catastrophes while overlooking emerging opportunities and increasing human capacities?
What lessons can we learn from errors of thinkers in the past to avoid applying the same flawed methodology to our own analysis of the future? The limits to growth appear to advance and recede before out very eyes: At the same time new sources of energy are being discovered and commercialized, new types of materials are being created to replace scarce ones, and more efficient means of utilizing resources are being developed.What is the Research Methods Knowledge Base?
The Research Methods Knowledge Base is a comprehensive web-based textbook that addresses all of the topics in a typical introductory undergraduate or. benjaminpohle.com: Research in Rehabilitation Counseling: A Guide to Design, Methodology, and Utilization, 2nd Ed.
(): James L. Bellini, Phillip D. Rumrill Jr.: Books. Before beginning your paper, you need to decide how you plan to design the study.. The research design refers to the overall strategy that you choose to integrate the different components of the.
Abstract: In grounded theory research it is commonly discouraged to conduct a literature review before data collection and analysis. Engaging with the literature about the researched area in that. Research Methodology chapter describes research methods, approaches and designs in detail highlighting those used throughout the study, justifying my choice through describing advantages and.
Research philosophy is an important part of research methodology. Research philosophy is classified as ontology, epistemology and axiology. These philosophical approaches enable to decide which approach should be adopted by the researcher and why, which is derived from research questions (Saunders, Lewis, & Thornhill, ).